Thinking about it #2

As I have always understood it, from Hammurabi and Solon onwards, the purpose of “Law” was to protect the weak against the strong and the poor against the rich. I wonder what went wrong…

sit-on-gavel

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Thinking about it #2

    • The strong do not need protection from the weak, the rich do not need protection from the poor; the “Law” (apparently) exists to redress the balance of power. If it does not do this then it would seem to have no function or have been perverted to simply become another tool of the State to guarantee the social status quo. Would any other definition simply deny the “Law” any separate or real purpose, and what would that mean for every constitution ever devised?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s